The Detroit Free Press recently reported on comments made by Edward Peters, who teaches Catholic canon law and was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI in 2010 to advise the top judicial authority in the Catholic Church.
Peters stated that Catholic teaching makes it clear that marriage is between one man and one woman. He goes on to write, “Catholics who promote ‘same-sex marriage’ act contrary to ‘Catholic law’ and should not approach for holy Communion…They also risk having holy Communion withheld from them…being rebuked and/or being sanctioned.”
Allen Vigneron, Archbishop of Detroit, offered this clarification: “For a Catholic to receive holy Communion and still deny the revelation Christ entrusted to the church is to try to say two contradictory things at once: ‘I believe the church offers the saving truth of Jesus, and I reject what the church teaches.’ In effect, they would contradict themselves. This sort of behavior would result in publicly renouncing one’s integrity and logically bring shame for a double-dealing that is not unlike perjury.”
I believe that using Communion as such a manipulative tool surely profanes the sacrament. Perhaps these Catholic leaders should revisit their church’s theology of the Eucharist. Reception of the body and blood of Christ at Communion is God’s gift to God’s people, not a reward for right behavior. We receive Communion not because we are worthy of it, but because God’s offers us the body and blood of Christ despite our unworthiness.
While some are seeking to withhold Communion from pro-choice and pro-marriage-equality Catholics, I have heard no call to withhold Communion from priests and bishops who have engaged in horrific sexual abuse against vulnerable children, nor their enablers. Bernard Cardinal Law, whose administration actively facilitated the moving around of known pedophile priests to other unsuspecting parishes, has not been denied Communion, but instead been rewarded with a prestigious church in Rome.
- Bishop Gene Robinson, in The Washington Post.
With deep digging into all that’s involved in these types of topics, it’s apparent that hypocrisy, apostacy, and the basic human nature of sexuality are mixed and confusingl with any meaningful understanding.
I believe mankind is putting its primal desires ahead of the True Gospel as seen in the Holy Bible. I believe most religions and a vast majority of their churches are woefully weak in preaching the basic tennants of what Jesus Christ and his apostles taught. Man is reaching out to justify his behavior by selecting verses out of context, and finding wrong answers
Nowhere in the Scriptures does it ever suggest, imply or give any sort of credibility to having marriage between and man and woman, and mandates that any sexual behavior outside of marriage is sinful. But man’s selfish desire to enjoy pleasures, especially sinful, is the driving force that finds no argument in the present preaching of most churches.
Correction. Where I said, ” credibility to having marriage between and man and woman,”
It should read, “credibility to having marriage between man and woman is not the proper institution ordained by God…..”
Of course my original comment was not proofread by me, and I stand corrected.