I’ve seen many loonytune arguments against marriage equality (including those by Catholic bishops), but this takes the cake. If the bishops’ arguments are on “the outer fringes of Crazytown”, these guys are way out in the exurbs.
By their reasoning, calls for same-sex marriage have nothing to do with equality, and still less to do with love and commitment. From their perspective, lesbians will shack up together, but continue to have sex with men – to entrap the innocent suckers into impregnating them, thus becoming liable for hefty child-support payments to those crafty, scheming women (who will also be pulling in government handouts). It’s all a feminist plot, in collusion with acquiescent government, to hand over control and money to the feminists. This collusion with government is then described as a form of polygamy – two women, plus government. (No, really).
Feminist “marriage” is a three-way contract between two women and government. Most women will have children, and few women can afford or will go to the length of using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Government is the automatic third party collecting “child support” entitlements for children borne in these marriages.
Children will be borne of extramarital affairs backed by welfare guarantees and child support entitlements. Feminist marriages are automatically entitled with many entitled, tax-free, governmental income sources for having children.
Feminist marriage is a marriage between any two women and the welfare state. It constitutes a powerful feminist takeover of marriage by government, and places the National Organization for Women in the position of dictating government policy as a matter of “feminist Constitutional rights”.
And the gay men, starved for real sex, will continue to go out and fuck women, creating hordes of illegitimate children, in a deliberate attempt to create a male underclass, to siphon off government welfare payments. (No, I can’t unravel the reasoning, either). Here’s the text.
Male-Male marriages: Marriages between two men are designed to be a “marital underclass”. In most cases, these men will become “fathers” without consent. Women in feminist marriages will not mention they stopped using birth control. Male-male marriages will be forced to pay child support to feminist marriages and become economically-enslaved to them. The taxpayer will be forced to pay for child support men cannot afford to pay, as occurs in out existing welfare state.
Male-male marriages cannot reproduce naturally (a primary factor in Constitutional case law). They can acquire children only by artificial means, and at great expense, by adoption or renting a womb. Most men in these marriages will still have regular sexual encounters with women.
-The Centre for Marriage Policy
Are these guys serious, or is it some kind of unseasonal April Fool’s Joke?
No, wait, perhaps this is truly seasonal, after all. If this new outfit campaigning against same – sex marriage can only get enough coverage for their turkeys, perhaps they can discredit the entire case against. Then we’ll all have something for which we can be truly thankful.
Have a great Thanksgiving, all you guys stateside.
(H/t to Right Wing Watch)
Related articles
” (1985), by Rosemary Curb and Nancy Manahan.
