3 Years: Looking Back, Looking Ahead.

It’s that time of year for looking back on the past 12 months, and anticipating the next, but I’m not going to go into that in any depth.

As many other sites have pointed out, in many respects it has been a great year for the cause of LGBT equality. One highlight was approval for gay marriage in New York, and also civil unions in Illinois, Hawaii and Rhode Island. Internationally, civil partnerships took effect in Ireland, and full marriage has been promised for Denmark (2o12, including church weddings), Finland and the UK. Brazil quietly achieved de facto marriage equality by court decision, civil unions promised for Chile, and possibly other countries in South America. Public support for gay marriage crossed the 5o% threshold in the US, and is even stronger elsewhere.

Crowd in support of Gay Marriage

 DADT was repealed, and with it gays in the military acquired a public face, dramatically illustrated by the Navy “first kiss” earlier this month. Now, the struggle turns to giving full practical effect to that equality, in housing and other staff benefits. In the rest of the world, “equality” means something much more basic, the freedom from criminal sanctions and public persecution, but there too, there is progress: pressure is building for basic LGBT rights worldwide, both from internal pressures in these countries, and from external pressure, from international organizations and Western governments.

In the churches, progress was symbolized right at the start of 2011, by a New Year’s Day wedding of two lesbian priests in Boston’s Episcopal Cathedral, and capped later by the US Presbyterian Church’s ratification of the 2010 vote to leave the matter of approval for openly lesbian or gay clergy to local decision, thus opening the way for publicly approved ministry for at least some such pastors. The Scottish Kirk took a similar decision, and queer clergy are becoming more visible in many other denominations, worldwide.

Even in the Catholic Church, there has been significant progress. While much of the public attention has been focussed on the fuss over some bishops’ strenuous opposition to gay marriage, there has been less attention on what was not said: there has been very little hostility publicly expressed by Church spokesmen to homoerotic relationships themselves. On the few occasions where priests have spoken or acted in a manner seen to be overtly homophobic, in Canada, in Texas, or in Australia, they have been smartly smacked down by their bishops. In London, the Archbishop of Westminster has even acknowledged that there is a good case to be made for the value of civil unions/partnerships.

All of this has been adequately documented elsewhere, and in my own previous posts. I’m not going to push the point.

Instead, I want to engage in a more personal reflection: this time also represents three completed years since I launched Queering the Church. How have I done? (more…)

Demonic Hysteria Continues.

Over at La Salette, the hysteria over perceived demonic influence at this site continues. This time, the concern is directed at Fr JohnQ’s defence of my original post. Once again, the crazy’s attempted refutation depends on extended observations that are entirely irrelevant to what Fr John, or I, actually wrote. This time, his statements are all about how Jesus, while fully human, was also perfect. I have no problem, with that.

Stained glass at St John the Baptist's Anglica...

So, what’s the connection? It appears to lie in the belief that being perfect, he could not possibly have had a same-sex orientation (perhaps not any sexual impulses at all). Why not? Well, presumably because the homosexual condition is intrinsically disordered. I just don’t buy that. The claim may be in the notorious CDF document, but anybody who is prepared to swallow every disordered statement on human sexuality from the Vatican, just because it has been written by sexually repressed, celibate theologians with no real-life experience of the subject they are able to admit to, is not living on the same planet as the rest of us.

There’s one feature above all that fascinates me about the fulminations of these orthotoxic Catholics (thanks, Jim McCrae, for this useful and descriptive label). That is how they base the bulk of their arguments on entirely theoretical constructs, almost completely ignoring any kind of evidence – from either the Gospels, or from empirical research. No basis in reality, whatever.

So, back in the real world, it’s worth taking another look at what got them so agitated in the first place: a reference in my post on John the Evangelist that he may have had a relationship of special intimacy with Jesus.  I did not make the claim, in this post or previously (which they appeared to assume), that Jesus was “homosexual” (gasp!), or that this relationship was sexual (horror)!  However, I want to be absolutely clear on what I have said in the past.

At this time of year, with its constant thoughts on the Nativity and Holy Family, we should also reflect on Jesus’ own Queer Family. We must also recognize that the incarnation means more than simply becoming a baby in a crib: it also entailed becoming fully human, in a specifically male body, experiencing all the sexual impulses and physical responses that other men have (and experiencing these impulses does not make him in any way less perfect). He was not in any way “gay” in the modern sense of the word, but based on the evidence of his life and words, could be described as “genderqueer“. Certainly, his ministry constituted a rejection of what some people refer to as the “traditional” family, as shown by the Gospels’ Queer Values.

Not only are there distinctly queer themes in the life and message of Christ, but the Catholic Church itself, while outwardly homophobic, displays many homoerotic characteristics. These are evident in much of the clerical culture and practices, but also in the rich history of queer saints and martyrs. (I have been rather neglecting these over the last year or so, but will now be giving them far more attention again, as I work towards assembling the entire narrative for publication in book form. For new readers who have missed the earlier posts, catch up at the queer saints pages:

For existing readers, and especially all who have contributed to the lively comments thread to the previous post on this, thanks for the support. It’s made for a terrific end to 2o11.
Happy New Year to all.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Spiritual Health Warning: Demonic Influences at Work at QTC.

PAUL ANTHONY MELANSON at La Salette Journey has devoted an entire post to the alarming subject of Terence Weldon: Homosexual Activist, in which he accuses me, among other things, of blasphemy.

Terence Weldon has engaged in blasphemy against the Lord Jesus.  Blasphemy, as Father John Hardon, S.J., explains, “..is every form of speaking against God in a scornful or abusive way.  Blasphemy need not be expressed in speech.  It can be purely internal in thought or desire.  And it can become externally manifest in actions that are blasphemous twice over: once because of the internal contempt for God which inspires the action, and once again because the blasphemer goes so far as to profess his opposition to God so that others are scandalized by the blasphemy.” 

But wait, there’s more. That’s mild, compared to the comments.

Ellen Wironken said…

Every lie comes from the Devil (John 8:44). Lies such as this one, which seek to cast doubt about Jesus’ purity, are particularly demonic. I believe this is strong evidence of demonic activity in Weldon’s life.

Wendy said…

The demon of corruption, the demon of blasphemy is prowling about seeking souls to devour.

http://www.spiritdaily.org

/gobbiheart2.htm

Ted Loiseau said…

Terry Weldon should be excommunicated from the Church. I read where this radical activist is an Extraordinary Minister of the Eucharist.

If this is true, it is an outrage.

You have been warned: Here be demons.

(On the other hand, I’ve also been accused before of being guided by the Holy Spirit herself. Take your pick).

Enhanced by Zemanta

David the Prophet & Jonathan, His Lover

The story of David and Jonathan is one of those most frequently quoted in any discussion of biblical same sex relationships. As with the stories of Ruth & Naomi, or of Jesus and John (the “beloved disciple”), it is similarly bedeviled by discussion over the degree of physical intimacy involved (was there or wasn’t there?), and the impossibility of knowing for certain.

Personally, I see these questions as something of a distraction, just as I do with the other cases. Gay men are frequently accused of being “obsessed” with genital sex. If we only accept as “gay” those men for whom we know there was this genital activity, we are simply reinforcing the stereotype. I prefer simply to recognize that there was clearly a deeply intimate emotional relationship here, and to ignore the degree of physical expression. (Chris Glaser has pointed out that whatever the nature of the relationships, the stories of David & Jonathan, and of Ruth and Naomi, are the two longest love stories told in the Bible – longer than any obviously heterosexual love stories. Marriage in Biblical times was not about love. See “Coming Out as Sacrament“)

However, for those who are determined to dig deeper, there is a reference by John McNeill (in Sex as God Intended) which is worth thinking about. (more…)

Dec 27th: John, the (Queer) Evangelist.

The Gospel of John is of particular interest to queer people of faith for its repeated references to the “beloved disciple”, or to “the disciple that Jesus loved”. These references make clear that whoever he was, this disciple had a relationship with Jesus of particular intimacy. There’s the well-known scene from the Last Supper where he rests his head on Jesus’ breast (or lap), and at the crucifixion, he is the only man standing among the women at the foot of the cross. He is the one to whom Christ entrusts the care of his mother – rather as a surviving spouse in marriage would assume some responsibility for the care of a mother-in-law. The existence of this special relationship  provides much of the argument for the proposition that Jesus’ sexual orientation may have been what we call “gay”.

(more…)

Irish Broadcaster Leaves Church Over Its Refusal to Ordain Women

Broadcaster Olivia O’Leary has, very publicly, left the Catholic Church.

The Carlow-born journalist renounced Catholicism because of the church’s refusal to ordain women, though the institutional cover-up of clerical child sex abuse was a “proximate factor”.

This Christmas, Ms O’Leary, who was educated by Convent of Mercy nuns, will celebrate Christmas with carols and lessons at the Church of Ireland St Patrick’s Cathedral in Dublin.

The former Today Tonight anchor used her regular and popular essay on RTE radio’s Drivetime programme to explain why she left the church some two years ago.

The central reason was the continued refusal of the church to accept the equality of women, “in other words, to ordain us”.

Weary O’Leary leaves church over its refusal to ordain women 

“No longer at my age can I accept a subordinate role; not for myself, not for my daughter, not for my sisters, my nieces or friends,” the 61-year-old current affairs presenter declared.

She added that other women had walked out of the church a long time ago.

“Maybe I just kept hoping,” she added.

“At this stage I don’t feel rage so much as weariness — that ‘difference’ is still latched onto as a reason to discriminate; weariness and, for me, relief, that it’s all over now. I’ve moved on out.”

She said it had taken her so long to leave because she knew, perhaps, how much she would miss the church, especially the Liturgy, which she described as “one of the the world’s great art forms and “such a comfort at times of loss and pain”.

And she was also mindful of what she called the “family connections” — “beloved aunts who are nuns, beloved uncles who are priests and good kind friends who are nuns and priests”.

“But it is their humanity that distinguishes them, not their role in an institution. And it is our humanity which distinguishes us, not the fact that we are women.

“So a church that does not recognise that. . . is in an ethical desert, like white-only churches in the American south or in apartheid South Africa.”

She said that among the reasons she would celebrate Christmas in St Patrick’s Cathedral was that she could stand tall there.

“I can stand tall because the Church of Ireland, whether I join it or not, accepts my full humanity. It ordains women.

“Otherwise I’ll celebrate by simply being outside in the wind and the rain, outside in the sunshine walking the world that the creator made for us all equally.

“Not because we are male or female but because we are human,” she concluded.

 - Independent.ie.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Conservatives Rallying to Preserve Gay Marriage, New Hampshire.

Sometime next month, the GOP-controlled legislature in New Hampshire will take up consideration of a bill to repeal marriage equality that was introduced when the state was controlled by Democrats. One of the fascinating features of this proposal has been how much opposition has emerged from within the Republican / conservative camp. An October opinion poll showed that over 60% of NH voters opposed repeal – and that included almost half of Republican voters. Some prominent Republicans have joined a coalition speaking up to preserve marriage equality, and the state’s Young Republicans have declared themselves against repeal.

An opinion piece in the Nashua Telegraph by Travis Blais provides an articulate, thoughtful exposition of the conservative case for gay marriage – in New Hampshire, or elsewhere. First, he discusses the fundamental principle of individual freedom, then continues with the value of marriage equality in contributing to social stability and prosperity:

Opponents of same-sex marriage speak of its downsides, including the devaluation of traditional character values, further instability in the nuclear family and concern for where the slippery slope will slip next, say, toward polygamy. At the same time, however, the animus against homosexual orientation and relationships inflicts its own set of harms that are more tangible, direct and immediate.

Otherwise innocent individuals are subjected to violence and bullying, depression, estrangement from family and society, self-destructive behavior and suicide. These are our friends, neighbors, colleagues and family members; they don’t deserve to live this way.

Not only does the balance of interests not overcome the presumption toward freedom, it points in the opposite direction. Even better, helping our gay fellow citizens be more productive, satisfied and socially constructive doesn’t cost money. It’s fiscally responsible.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Marriage equality gains, world – wide.

In a thoughtful review of LGBT gains in 2011,  San Diego Gay and Lesbian News picks out three especially notable features: the final end of DADT in the US, the emergence of LGBT activists in Africa – and further notable movement towards marriage equality.

I’ll leave comment on DADT to the Americans, but I am trying to work towards a post on LGBT progress in Africa (and the most appropriate role for Western countries and activists to contribute).

I have frequently written about progress to marriage equality – but this is a useful summary. (Note particularly the reference to a “little – noticed” decision in favour of traditional same – sex marriage by a Kenyan court. I for one, was not previously aware of this. Note, too that this is court recognition of traditional same-sex marriage.  It is homophobia, not respect for homoerotic relationships, that is a Western import.  Here’s a link to the story).

Same-sex marriage (or “marriage equality” or “gay marriage”) was a leading international concern — whether in the West or raised as a chimeric threat, particularly in Africa. This year it was legalized in the second-most-populous U.S. state, home to the UN and intentional media – New York state. American polls also, for the first time, showed clear majority support for marriage equality.

The immigration problems of bi-national, same-sex couples due to the Bill Clinton-era federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) drew national attention in America, but the Obama administration was criticized for being slow to act to use its powers to stop deportations of husbands and wives.

In the UK the Conservative-led government committed itself to marriage equality, there is to be a consultation next year, with Tory Prime Minister David Cameron famously saying he supported it because he was a conservative. The Scottish Nationalist government in Scotland appears likely to legalize same-sex marriage too, although there has been a strong, Catholic Church-led backlash.

In France, although marriage equality failed in the French parliament it is rumored that President Nicholas Sarkozy will announce his support in elections next year, supposedly inspired by Cameron’s comments. But in Spain, lesbians and gays fear that a new conservative government may go backwards and convert gay marriages into gay civil unions.

It’s been proposed by the Luxembourg government and by the Finnish government, and the Danish government permitted gay marriage in churches. The German parliament is going to vote on marriage equality next year. Civil partnerships are being mooted in Poland and Estonia — a first in a post-Soviet Union state.

Last month the governing Australian Labor Party supported same-sex marriage, though its leader does not and it is likely to fail when it reaches the parliament next year.

In July the Constitutional Court of Colombia ordered the Colombian government to legislate on same-sex relationship recognition — and that if they fail to, same-sex couples will be granted all marriage rights in two years.

Brazil’s Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples are legally entitled to civil unions, and same-sex marriage will be included in the new Nepalese constitution.

In October, in a little noticed but extremely interesting case, a Kenyan court recognized “traditional” same-sex marriage.

In July, a court in Delhi, India, effectively recognized the marriage of a lesbian couple, whilst ordering that the state must protect them.

via San Diego Gay and Lesbian News.

Enhanced by Zemanta

“Women Deacons: Past, Present Future”

I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae. 2 I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of his people and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been the benefactor of many people, including me.

 3 Greet Priscilla and Aquila, my co-workers in Christ Jesus. 4 They risked their lives for me. Not only I but all the churches of the Gentiles are grateful to them….

7 Greet Andronicus and Junia, my fellow Jews who have been in prison with me. They are outstanding among the apostles, and they were in Christ before I was.

-Romans 16:1 -4, 7

The  ordination of women as priests is a controversial topic in the Catholic Church. Research shows that a substantial proportion of Catholics want it, the Vatican line is that it is theologically impossible (even though the majority of Protestant denominations have found no impediment). However, the ordination of deacons should present few obstacles – as the quotation above shows, the earliest church saw no difficulty with women deacons. Phoebe is explicitly described as a deacon, Priscilla and Aquilla as co-workers with Paul, and Junia as “outstanding among the apostles”. The scriptural evidence is clear, that women were active in ministry, including the diaconate.

The historical evidence complements that of Scripture.  Over 5o ooo women deacons served the church during the first millenium, of whom over 1oo are known to us by name, including 29 listed as saints or martyrs.

Yet, the subject of women deacons in the Church is unduly neglected, receiving little attention or discussion. A new book by Gary Macy, William T. Ditewig, and Phyllis Zagano could change that.

In their new book, Women Deacons: Past, Present Future, Gary Macy, William T. Ditewig, and Phyllis Zagano revisit the question of women’s ordination to the diaconate in the Roman Catholic Church. Unlike ordination to the priesthood, women’s ordination to the diaconate has unambiguous roots in the Christian New Testament, where Phoebe is named as a deacon of the church in Cenchrae (Rm. 16:1). Likewise, Roman Catholic canon law appears to have much more wiggle room with regard to the diaconate.

Macy, Ditewig, and Zagano have been swimming in the often choppy sea of questions around the ordination of women in the Catholic Church for many years. RD contributor Elizabeth Drescher talked with the three writers about how their collaborative project advances the conversation.

(Read the interview at Religion Dispatches)

In an open letter to Pope Benedict in April this year, Zagano noted that the subject of women deacons has been nominally under discussion ever since Vatican II, and that Benedict himself had raised it as a possibility, in a meeting with the priests of Rome in 2oo6. Earlier this year, the Swiss Bishop of St. Gall, Markus Bűchel, said women deacons were a good idea, as have many other modern bishops. It is high time that this moved beyond the realm of idle talk, and on to serious debate and planning.

Ray Grosswirth adds information on an interesting twist to this publication – a campaign to get Catholic bishops to read the book.

In an attempt to get bishops to read ‘Women Deacons: Past, Present Future,’ there is a ‘Books to Bishops’ campaign underway. Paulist Press will send a copy of this book if contributors send Phyllis Zagano a check for $10.00 per bishop. Phyllis in turn will send checks and individual letters naming donors to Paulist Press, which adds a book order form for more and sends each bishop a copy of the book. Checks may be sent to Phyllis at her office: Phyllis Zagano, Religion-104 Heger Hall, 115 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 10549.

Let’s hope that U.S. bishops are persuaded by the above mentioned book.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Your Holiness, it is time for women deacons (Phyllis Zagano, NCR on-line)

Posted in Uncategorized. 4 Comments »

Gay Man “Apologizes” For Destroying GOP Leader’s Marriage

Supporters of marriage equality have often asked their opponents to clarify their argument, to explain just how gay marriage can threaten their own. Now we know – and in Minnesota, where GOP politicians and Catholic bishops are working to entrench discrimination in their defence of marriage, one gay man has offered an apology for the way in which equality activists have destroyed one high-profile heterosexual marriage in particular.

On Behalf Of All Gays, Man “Apologizes” For Destroying GOPer’s Marriage

After now-former Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch (R) resigned her leadership post over an “innappropriate relationship,” a Minneapolis gay man — on behalf of the entire gay community — is pouring salt on the wound.

John Medeiros, who curates an LGBT reading series in Minneapolis, wrote an open letter to Koch, saying he is sorry gays and lesbians have destroyed the institution of marriage and contributing to her inevitable relationship with a subordinate staffer.

“These recent events have made it quite clear that our gay and lesbian tacts have gone too far, affecting even the most respectful of our society,” Medeiros wrote in the letter. He continues:

We apologize that our selfish requests to marry those we love has cheapened and degraded traditional marriage so much that we caused you to stray from your own holy union for something more cheap and tawdry.  And we are doubly remorseful in knowing that many will see this as a form of sexual harassment of a subordinate.

- TPMDC.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Switch to our mobile site