It’s that time of year for looking back on the past 12 months, and anticipating the next, but I’m not going to go into that in any depth.
As many other sites have pointed out, in many respects it has been a great year for the cause of LGBT equality. One highlight was approval for gay marriage in New York, and also civil unions in Illinois, Hawaii and Rhode Island. Internationally, civil partnerships took effect in Ireland, and full marriage has been promised for Denmark (2o12, including church weddings), Finland and the UK. Brazil quietly achieved de facto marriage equality by court decision, civil unions promised for Chile, and possibly other countries in South America. Public support for gay marriage crossed the 5o% threshold in the US, and is even stronger elsewhere.
DADT was repealed, and with it gays in the military acquired a public face, dramatically illustrated by the Navy “first kiss” earlier this month. Now, the struggle turns to giving full practical effect to that equality, in housing and other staff benefits. In the rest of the world, “equality” means something much more basic, the freedom from criminal sanctions and public persecution, but there too, there is progress: pressure is building for basic LGBT rights worldwide, both from internal pressures in these countries, and from external pressure, from international organizations and Western governments.
In the churches, progress was symbolized right at the start of 2011, by a New Year’s Day wedding of two lesbian priests in Boston’s Episcopal Cathedral, and capped later by the US Presbyterian Church’s ratification of the 2010 vote to leave the matter of approval for openly lesbian or gay clergy to local decision, thus opening the way for publicly approved ministry for at least some such pastors. The Scottish Kirk took a similar decision, and queer clergy are becoming more visible in many other denominations, worldwide.
Even in the Catholic Church, there has been significant progress. While much of the public attention has been focussed on the fuss over some bishops’ strenuous opposition to gay marriage, there has been less attention on what was not said: there has been very little hostility publicly expressed by Church spokesmen to homoerotic relationships themselves. On the few occasions where priests have spoken or acted in a manner seen to be overtly homophobic, in Canada, in Texas, or in Australia, they have been smartly smacked down by their bishops. In London, the Archbishop of Westminster has even acknowledged that there is a good case to be made for the value of civil unions/partnerships.
All of this has been adequately documented elsewhere, and in my own previous posts. I’m not going to push the point.
Instead, I want to engage in a more personal reflection: this time also represents three completed years since I launched Queering the Church. How have I done? (more…)





























