The Subversion of Vatican II, Laid Bare

For anybody looking at the papacy and the Vatican from the outside, the nature of the problem is fairly clear:  we have a monolithic, centralized power structure dominated by people far removed from real life, steeped in fossilised theology from the middle ages, who are convinced not only that they are the sole holders of truth, but also that they thereby have the right to legislate for all Catholics everywhere. This goes to the heart of so much of what is wrong with the church today, from the total disconnect between official teaching on sexuality and the lived experience of ordinary Catholics to the appallingly inappropriate response of the Vatican (and the supporting chorus of bishops around the world) to the worldwide scandal of clerical sexual abuse. The oligarchy claim that Benedict has done a great deal to fight the problem, pointing to his many interventions in canon law.

This, however, is precisely the point:  that Benedict and his minions are inherently incapabel of seing anything, or doing anything, except in the context of canon law, church teaching, and the curial bureaucracy.  They have no conception of dealing real people, or of the importance of secular law and authority, or even of the simple principles of love and genuine human interaction as promoted by the Gospel.

The second Vatican Council appeared for a while to breathe fresh air into the church, pointin the way to a more inclusive structure, with greater sensitivity to the modern world, but this brief promise was soon swept away.  All this is clear.

A new book by an eminent scholar is welcome for putting the obvious into clear theological terms.  Judging by this review from National Catholic Reporter, this book would seem to be compulsory reading for anyone seeking understanding of how the modern crisis of the church has developed.   (more…)

John McNeill on Conscience: Part II

Yesterday, I placed Part I of John McNeill’s series on “Freedom of Conscience”, taken from his blog “Spiritual Transformartion.”

Moral life, then, is evolutionary. It is a dynamic dialectic of fact and possibility, of the actual and the ideal. We must look for ideal human nature not in the past but in the future. And the key to that future is the creative moral freedom of humans. In this evolutionary framework natural law should no longer be understood as based on a static structure or essence; rather, it represents a statement of conditions for humanity’s own growth seen as a possibility and a task to be freely accomplished.

Conscience within this perspective is a developing form of self-awareness; it is to be understood as the deepest self-con (more…)

World’s Worst Logo

(This was originally posted a year ago, but is even more appropriate now)

Yes, I know that sexual abuse is serious; that clerical misdemeanours are scandalous, and not a laughing matter; and that 1973 was a long time ago, in an age of greater innocence. But STILL – sometimes it’s good to have a giggle. A singularly inappropriate logo for a church youth commission comes to you fromAndrew Sullivan, who got it from Afrojacks (who notes that it even won an art award for design. Go figure – it’s not only the church that missed the boat on this one.

“Via Afrojacks, One imagines that this 1973 design for the Catholic Church’s Archdiocesan Youth Commission would not make the cut today. “

Inappropriatelogo

Beyond Celibacy, A Doctrinal Problem.

The original sin here is doctrinal.

The problem isn’t celibacy – or only celibacy – it’s the Church’s cramped and careless view of nature, and specifically sexual nature.  The Church trumpets the notion that God has ordained sex only for procreation, and that God’s nature is itself being violated by every sexual act with any other intention; and even a correct intention isn’t enough if the act isn’t within a properly consecrated heterosexual marriage.  This is nature writ very small.

In contrast, the demand that priests be lifelong celibates is a decree to those who are merely human to defy nature itself.  What was originally crafted as a supreme sacrifice to God has turned into (if it has not always been) the institutional torture of human beings that plays out in these all too predictable everyday tragedies.  Yes, some priests don’t molest children.  Perhaps the Vatican is correct that the vast majority of priests are entirely innocent of the charge.

But if anyone believes any majority of priests is actually celibate, they certainly aren’t very vocal about it.   A reasoned definition of nature must include human nature.  Even without being philosophers, most Catholics have a more coherent view of human nature than their Church does, as they mock the Vatican’s mad directive about birth control.

Priests and homosexuals are the only small groups that the Vatican still feels it can impose its disordered view of nature upon.  The priests can speak for themselves, as can the remaining homosexuals who continue on as Catholics.

But the Vatican insists on burdening the rest of the world with its error about human nature in its stepped up campaign against gay marriage — and gay rights more generally — worldwide.  What it cannot enforce upon its own clergy it wishes civil government to order for homosexual citizens – and digs deep into its pockets for the funds.  This miserable crusade is the best the Vatican can do to distract from its barely existent threads of credibility on sexual matters.

None of the Church’s problems will or can be solved until it is able to acknowledge that it is wrong about sex

Posted in Church Reform. No Comments »

Peter Toscano on Defection From the Catholic Church

In discussion last year about Fr James Martin’s “America” blog post last year on the question, “What is a Gay Catholic to Do”", one of the responses I described that is often taken is simply to leave (“shaking the dust from my feet”, as one respondent described it, quoting a verse from the New Testament.  In the wake of the heavy volumes of publicity recently given to the problems of sexual abuse, and the associated cover-ups and inadequate response from the institutional Church, the letters columns of several newspapers have featured correspondence from people who have left the church – some pained at being driven to do so now, others smug at having done so years ago.  Unless the church does something dramatic to rescue its shattered credibility, we can expect many more such withdrawals from the church.  Some will be quiet and personal, done without fanfare, some will be personal but formal, and others will be public.

In the case of Peter Toscano and his partner Glen Retief, the reasons for withdrawal are two-fold: gay exclusion, and also the abuse disgrace.    At his blog, “Peterson Toscano’s A Musing” Peter reflects on his defection from the Roman Catholic Church, and shares with us a formal letter of resignation that his partner Glen Retief has sent to his bishop. This decision is not one that I share, but it is one with which I have deep sympathy.  Michael Kelly, James L’Empereur and several other notable theologians have expressed similar views on the need for queer Catholics to leave the Church, figuratively or literally, temporarily or permanently.  Some will return after a period of exile, others will find permanent new homes elsewhere. Here is Peter Toscano’s musing on leaving the Catholic Church:

My partner Glen Retief and I were both baptized into the Roman Catholic Church, taken First Holy Communion and Confirmation. We no longer attend mass and in fact have become involved with the Religious Society of Friends (Quaker).

(more…)

Beyond Dualism in Politics: The Value of a Third Party.

I wrote a few weeks ago about James L’Empereur’s argument that we as gay and lesbian Christians have special spiritual gifts which we need to share with the wider church, but did not elaborate then on quite what they were. One part of that is a greater ability on our part to move beyond simplistic, dualistic ways of looking at the world. The Church draws hard distinctions between male and female, between sex for procreation and total abstinence, between an ordained ministry and a subordinate laity.  We know differently:  gender is not uniquely determined by biological sex, nor is it fixed and immutable. This is a big topic, which I will be returning to soon (after I have explored some examples from other cultrues and times.  There is method here, in my madness). But first, an example of the advantages of moving beyond dualistic thinking from the world of british politics. (more…)

Posted in Uncategorized. No Comments »

A Countdown to Vatican III?

Possibly the most remarkable feature of the explosion of news and commentary on clerical sexual abuse around the world, has been how swiftly and fundamentally the nature of church reaction has changed. For decades, there was virtually no response beyond shuffling the perpetrators around dioceses, or simply blaming “gay priests”. That began to change after the Irish Ryan report took a far franker and more honest look at the problems in Dublin than had previously been done elsewhere, and especially since the governmental Murphy report went beyond the abuse itself to reveal patterns of Church secrecy, cover-ups and protection of offenders.

After the emergence of similar stories from continental Europe, and especially in the German speaking countries in Benedict’s backyard, suddenly there has been a clamour of comment form senior clerics. Especially over the past week, the number of national church speaking up to defend the person of Pope Benedict and his record appears to be a clearly orchestrated campaign. Much of it is still the good old shoot the messenger, impugn the motives stuff, confusing attacks on the pope or on the leadership with attacks on the church as a whole. But there have also been a number of prominent, highly placed insiders, who have combined defence of specific actions with calls for deep seated reform. (more…)

Freedom of Conscience

In Washington DC, here in the UK and in Ireland, Catholic church authorities have resisted moves toward gay equality and civil rights by insiting on religious freedom of conscience for themselves.  This, of course, completely overlooks the equally important teaching on freedom of conscience within the church, which John McNeill reminds us was one of the key teachings to come out of Vatican II, and whihc is widely accepted in the church today by married Catholics who disregard “Humane Vitae” .

McNeill has written a three part-series on conscience at his blog, Spiritual Transformations – a site we should all bookmark and visit frequently.

This is Part I (the emphasis added is mine) :

Bishop E Carter

Bishop G. Emmett Carter observed in his comments on the Declaration on Christian Education that the theme of personal responsibility dominated many of the deliberations of the Second Vatican Council (Carter, 1966, p. 640, footnote). One such example is found in the opening lines of the Declaration on Religious Freedom which reads as follows:

A sense of the dignity of the human person has been impressing itself more and more deeply on the consciousness of contemporary man. And the demand is increasingly made that humans should act on their own judgment, enjoying and making use of a responsible freedom, not driven by coercion but motivated by a sense of duty [Vatican Council II, 1966, n. 1, p. 675]. (more…)

Gay Marriage – In the Army, in Parliament

It’s just as well that the US wingnuts don’t pay too much attention to developments this side of the Atlantic.  These pictures simultaneously celebrate two of their biggest nightmares: gay marriage, in the military!

From The Independent:

(more…)

Abuse: State Inquiries For Northern Ireland, Switzerland.

The really important feature of the story of church  abuse in Ireland, was that the Murphy report, which resulted in special attention by Pope Benedict XVI and paved the way for an opening of the floodgates of disclosure across Europe, was that it was an investigation by a national government, not into the abuse itself, but into the cover-ups:  in effect, this was an investigation into the affairs and modus operandi of Catholic Church itself. IT may be this example that has prompted the German government to plan a similar investigation of their own, although the Chancellor Angela Merkel has said it will cover more than just the Catholic Church.

The Murphy report, though did not cover all of Ireland, just the diocese of Dublin. With the peculiar political structure of a divided Ireland, it was perhaps inevitable that the government of Northern Ireland should want an enquiry of their own, and now it seems they are going to get one. (Technically, this is part of a separate country, the UK, but falls under the jurisdiction of Cardinal Brady, who is primate not just of the Irish Republic, but is  “Primate of all Ireland”.)  Like Germany, this will investigate abuse across a wide range of institutions, not just the Catholic Church.

Together with the German investigation, this will surely encourage still more governments to conduct inquiries of their own.  (more…)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Switch to our mobile site