R.I. Compromise Approves Civil Unions

New York now has full marriage equality, Illinois, Hawaii, Delaware, Rhode Island have advanced civil unions this year.

In New England and the North East, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware and DC have now approved either full marriage or near-marriage for same-sex couples. The gaps are Maryland, and Pennsylvania.

One distinguishing feature of the New York victory was the superb political work of Governor Cuomo and his allies in getting all supporters working together, and well-funded. It will not always be possible to do so as effectively elsewhere. A second important feature in New York, and also in Rhode Island, was a willingness to make necessary compromises in order to make progress. NY accepted last-minute religious opt-outs in late negotiations, R.I. accepted the second prize of civil unions rather than full marriage, and also introduced some opt-outs for religion. These compromises are not satisfactory, and in an ideal world should not be necessary- but we do not live in an ideal world. The bottom line is that real progress has been made in two states where it has been stalled for years.

Maryland will have another chance to make progress next year.  For Pennsylvania, we must wait and see. The legislative lessons from New York and Rhode Island are clear.

In compromise, R.I. approves civil unions for same-sex couples

Less than a week after same-sex marriage was legalized in New York, the Rhode Island State Senate approved a bill last night allowing not marriage, but civil unions for gay couples, despite fierce opposition from gay-rights advocates who called the legislation discriminatory.

The bill, which already passed in the state’s House of Representatives and which the governor said he was likely to sign, would grant same-sex couples most of the rights and benefits that Rhode Island provides married couples. It was offered as a compromise this spring after Gordon D. Fox, the openly gay speaker of the Democrat-controlled House, said he could not muster enough votes to pass a same-sex marriage bill.

– The Boston Globe.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Catholic Role in NY Gay Marriage

During the build-up to last week’s vote, a headline in the Christian Science Monitor posed the question:  Could Catholics play a decisive role? Now that the vote is over and the dust settled, the answer is clear: Catholics did indeed play that decisive role, but not in the way the conservatives in the Church had wanted.

A key factor in the success this year, compared with the disaster two years ago, was the shift in voter sentiment. As with the picture nationally, polls have shown a strong increase in support for marriage equality, and 4o% of NY voters are Catholic. Polls also show that in general, Catholic voters are more supportive of marriage (that is, marriage for all) than the general population. Politicians of all stripes pay attention to voter sentiment – so we can conclude that Catholic voters helped to push their politicians in the right direction.

At the other end of the political spectrum, was the man with the greatest personal political influence, Governor Cuomo, a Catholic. His extraordinary effort was critical in mobilising the broad coalition, and the massive funds it raised, that persuaded key individual senators to change their minds and vote yes.

In the middle, were the politicians who cast the votes, many Catholics among them. In the assembly, the bill was sponsored by a Catholic, Daniel O’Donnell, in the senate, the bill’s champion was openly gay Tom Duane, who was raised Catholic. The tipping point this year was the group of senators who changed sides this year, which included two Catholic Republicans, senators Alesi  and Grisanti.

It is clear that Catholic influence permeated this victory for marriage, from top to bottom. Why? (more…)

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (Preamble)

Coinciding with the anniversary of Stonewall, and anticipating next week’s celebration of London Pride, the UK Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement met in Birmingham over the past weekend to celebrate their 35th anniversary.  I was invited to lead a workshop on a Catholic perspective, and found the preparation for it occupying much of my thinking over the past few months. The material for the workshop itself was presented in point form, but I do not want to see the product of so many hours work simply disappear. I have expanded my point form notes into a more formal text, which I am publishing here as a series of linked posts.

We’re meeting today to to celebrate 35 years of the Lesbian and Gay Christian movement, and as Catholics, to reflect on 35 years as queer people in the Catholic Church, to consider some possibilities for the next 35, and to look for ways to influence that future. Looking back is easy, so I will do that. Looking ahead is tougher, and knowing what to do is harder still: so I’m going to duck out of those issues, and leave them to you. But first, I will offer some structure, and a strictly personal perspective that I hope will be helpful. Specifically, I will be considering four major headings:

  • Where Have We Come From?
  • Where Are We Now? Some Irrevocable Transformations of the Church
  • Where Are We Now? Internal Contradictions in Church Teaching
  • Where Are We Headed, and What Can We Do About It?

The full piece is long, and so I have broken it into four separate posts, published (almost) simultaneously. Follow the links for the full argument.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (1: Where Have We Come From?)

When I was invited by LGCM to look at this issue for their 35th anniversary conference, my first response was to question, “When, exactly, was 35 years ago?” The answer of course, was 1976 – which has two deeply personal resonances for me. June 1976 was the start of the Youth Revolution in South Africa, where I spent most of my life against the rise and fall of apartheid, and in March 1976 my daughter Robynn was born. Thinking about each of these has influenced my thinking for today: the South African experience on where we are now, and Robynn on where we might be going.

But before considering those matters, let’s take a look at other features of 1976 more immediately relevant to all of us here.

LGBT Catholics: the promise of 1976

In addition to the founding of the LGCM in the UK, that year saw the publication of John McNeill’s groundbreaking “The Church and the Homosexual”, Sr Jeannine Gramick and Fr Robert Nugent hosted a workshop that led to the formation of New Ways Ministry, and in the UK, Quest adopted a formal constitution and its name.

These were promising starts, and to a degree that promise has been fulfilled. McNeill’s book has been followed by a steady stream of further writing, so that gay and lesbian theology, and its successor queer theology, have moved from oxymorons to recognition as specialist academic disciplines (with Patrick Cheng’s “Radical Love”, there is now even an introductory text book to queer theology, just as Elizabeth Stuart had earlier provided an introduction to gay and lesbian theology). However, after the publication of “The Church and the Homosexual”, McNeill was initially forced to suspend further writing on the subject, and later to leave his Jesuit order when he could  not, in conscience, remain silent.

New Ways has flourished, but its two founders were instructed by the CDF to cease their ministry. Nugent now works in entirely different areas, while Jeannine Gramick continued with similar work as a matter of conscience, but less directly, and only after being forced to leave her religious community for another.

Dignity and Quest remain as strong, active organisations operating across the US and the UK respectively, but both have lost some early recognition by the Church authorities.

LGBT Catholics: the disappointments following 1976

As we look at the intervening years from the perspective of the institutional church, the picture may appear even more depressing. Just a year before 1976, the Vatican had published Persona Humana on human sexuality, which initiated a notably strident tone on homosexuality. This became worse from 1978 with the accession of John Paul II, and culminated in the notorious Hallowe’en letter of 1986. The emergence of the sexual abuse scandals over the next two decades just made matters worse, with gay priests widely blamed as scapegoats, and initially the primary response to the problem seemed to be simply to ban gay candidates from entering seminaries. For many of us, the election of Benedict XVI to succeed John Paul was met with suspicion – it was his signature on the Hallowe’en letter. There were more hopeful signs – such as the US bishops’ more pastoral in their 1988 document, “Always our children”, a continuing, even accelerating flow of books by emerging gay and lesbian theologians, and in the UK the emergence of the Soho Masses as a visible sign of at least some greater degree of acceptance and inclusion in Westminster diocese, but overall, most people would probably judge these years as a time of darkness for sexual and gender minorities in the Catholic Church. Many would probably see no sign of change any time soon.

To assess these years only on the basis of what was going on by the big, landmark events within the institutional Catholic Church is misleading. I suggest that substantially more important are the ripple and incidental impacts of some earlier events, and of developments in other denominations. Looking at this bigger picture, I suggest, leads to a more hopeful outlook.

Three Crucial Events Prior to 1976

Three crucially important developments in the years leading up to 1976 were the meetings of the Second Vatican Council from 1962 -65, the publication of the encyclical on contraception, “Humanae Vitae” in 1978 – and the Stonewall riots of 1969. None of these concerned queer Catholics exclusively, but each has had continuing and expanding impact, with far-reaching implications for the future. Most people would agree that under the last two popes, there has been a determined rolling back of Vatican II, in spirit and in specifics. Nevertheless, some of the effects of the council are changes that cannot be undone – what Sr Joan Chittister once described as “ticking time bombs”. Toothpaste cannot be put back into the tube, genies cannot be forced back into the bottle. Humanae Vitae was written to address the specific issue of contraception, but its underlying core principle, that all sexual activity must be open to procreation, also underpins all of Vatican doctrine on sexual ethics. The notable failure of this doctrine to be accepted by the Church as a whole, in ever increasing degrees, simply calls into question the underlying principle – and with it, the entire structure of Vatican sexual doctrine. Stonewall on the face of it, had nothing to do with Catholicism, but the continuing degree to which we have responded by coming out publicly, coupled with the advances in equality and protections under secular law, are leading to an abundance of very visible queer families in our parishes, neighbourhoods and schools – families which frequently stand in total contradiction to the negative stereotypes that gave rise to so much prejudice in the past.

Parallel Developments in Other Denominatons

Alongside these time-delayed impacts from earlier years, we must also consider the impact of developments in other churches. In 1968, Troy Perry had founded the MCC with a handful of supporters in his own living room. Today, this is said to be one of the fastest -growing of all Christian denominations, with a world-wide presence. In small, incremental steps throughout the period, women’s ordination has been gaining ground. For example, in 1974, the first batch of women were ordained in the US Episcopal church – but without legal provision for it in church rules. But once it had been done without approval, pressure mounted for a change in the rules, which came two years later. This in turn put pressure on all other denominations to follow suit, which most did.

A similar process is now under way with the ordination of lesbian and gay clergy. Until recently, most denominations had clear rules against LGBT ordination, based on the assumption that homoerotic sexual activities were obviously sinful, and many good people were excluded from seminary, or expelled after ordination, on these grounds. This has changed dramatically in recent years, notably with the decisions by the ECLA and PCUSA to remove barriers, even for men or women who were both openly gay or lesbian, and partnered – provided that these partnerships were committed, faithful, and publicly accountable, in a manner comparable to conventional marriage. The largest Methodist denomination, the UMC, has not yet followed them, but pressure is building.

This in turn is bound to lead to approval, probably soon, for same-sex church weddings. Already, the Swedish and Icelandic Lutherans, which are both state churches, approved church weddings when laws providing for them alongside civil weddings took effect. Elsewhere, some local jurisdictions and local congregations have approved either full weddings, or blessings for same sex unions. The most dramatic of these was the January wedding of two Episcopal lesbian priests, both very senior in the diocese, in Boston Cathedral.

Legal provision for gay marriage (or near – marriage) has been spreading around the world, and is now available or promised on all continents. Accompanying the visibility of married or legally partnered gay couples, others are living together more openly in informal relationships, often with children. (It is estimated that there are now two million children in the US being raised by gay parents). In many instances, these queer families are moving out of the traditionally gay-friendly neighbourhoods, and moving into the suburbs, where -surprise – their lives are pretty much the same as anybody else’s.

 

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (2: Where Are We Now? Changes in the Church)

As we digest the impact of these past trends, I consider the implications in four key areas: the decline of Vatican power; internal contradictions in Vatican teaching on homoerotic relationships; the transformation of the laity; and the transformation of the priesthood.

The Vatican’s loss of control

A few months ago, an article in NCR online grabbed my attention, with a discussion of a book published in Italy with an intriguing title, which loosely translates into the English “Once, there was a Vatican”. From John Allen’s article, it appeared that the point of the title was the author’s lament for the decline in Vatican influence in political decision making, and in the previous control over politicians. I believe that the title has far wider application – and one that (unlike the author) I celebrate, rather than lament.

The loss of Vatican control over Catholic politicians is clearly demonstrated by many examples: the free availability of contraception in Ireland, gay marriage or civil unions in several Catholic countries. And most recently, Malta’s decision in a referendum to approve civil divorce. (The Philippines is now the only country which still has no provision for legal divorce).

Ever since Humanae Vitae, Catholic consciences have been asserting independence from Vatican dictates. The evidence from empirical research is that there is hardly a singly are of sexual ethics where most Catholics agree with the Vatican rules: emphatically not on contraception, but also not on masturbation, premarital sex, homoerotic relationships, or even abortion. (Possibly the only areas where Catholic and the Vatican agree are on condemnation of incest, and child abuse).

More remarkably, and not yet widely recognized, is how the Vatican has lost monopoly control of Catholic theology. Before Vatican II, only Catholic priests studied theology – in practice, even religious sisters were excluded. Ever since, religious women and lay people have joined them in increasing numbers, including openly gay or lesbian Catholics, and are now also teaching theology. Last June, a major academic conference on moral theolog / theological ethics was widely described as the second Council of Trent – and organised independently of the Vatican. Earlier this year, 40% of all professional theologians signed a public document calling for far-reaching revision of Vatican doctrines, and for fundamental changes to the clerical culture. When the CDF or bishops’ conferences criticize published theology books with which they disagree, the main result appears to be – a leap in sales.

There are even some tentative signs emerging that the Vatican is starting to lose its absolute control of Catholic ordination, Bishops and clergy. We see this in the general recognition that a significant proportion of priests are not keeping strictly to the rules on celibacy, and in some regions have regular lovers, even (it has been claimed) with the knowledge of some bishops. The womenpriests’ movement began (allegedly) when a bishop ordained a small group, and later elevated them to bishops. Archbishop Milongo of Zambia claims to have a large following of married priests he has ordained. Some groups of Catholics have formed intentional communities to avoid having unwanted priests forced on them, some celebrating Mass without benefit of regular clergy.

The Transformation of the Laity

Although there has been some backpedalling on the VII promises on lay participation, some degree of lay participation is clearly here to stay. We have become accustomed to lay ministers of the word and of the Eucharist, as catechists, as pastoral councils, and even as parish administrators. There are also numerous lay people formally trained in theology or in spirituality, and others who have undertaken at least moderate study in these areas.

Canon law now instructs that we should speak out when we disapprove of our pastors’ actions, and many of us do so freely. Even the most fiercely traditional Catholics feel free to criticize, when in their opinion the bishops are straying from the path of orthodoxy.

The Transformation of the Clergy and Seminary Training

When I was still in primary school, I and my classmates were seriously urged by the Christian Brothers to enter the minor seminary, as many young boys did, aged twelve. The result, as several priests of that generation have pointed out, was young men who were ordained at 25, with the sexual knowledge of a 12-year old. Today, many priests join as mature adults, often after a period in the secular workplace, and frequently having had sexual lives.

It used to be that seminarians were not permitted even to talk about sex, or to have “particular friendships”. Today, there is an awareness of the need for at least some training in human sexuality, and of the value of human friendship, even for priests.

Moral theology used to be taught by rote out of the theology manuals, largely unchanged since the Council of Trent. Modern training is (as I understand it) closer to the more familiar instruction found in higher education, with well-stocked libraries carrying far more than simply the manuals. Some of this will include the landmark publications of LGBT scholarship over the past thirty years.

Although the proposed responses differ widely, there is also widespread recognition that gay priests exist, and that some of them (like their straight counterparts) are not necessarily strictly celibate. A tiny handful of these have even declared themselves openly as gay, and managed to remain in ministry (especially where their work is not parish-based). My guess is that we will see many more priests inching at least part way out of the closet in the years ahead.

The Legacy of Sexual Abuse

This is a huge minefield in itself, which I do not propose covering in any detail. The key points are that there has been an obvious scepticism as a result about the clerical culture, and assumptions about the moral superiority, of the supposedly celibate clergy. Many competent analysts of the problem, even from among the bishops themselves, have suggested that the authoritarian power structures of the church, and possibly the rigid rules on compulsory celibacy, may be implicated as causal factors. My sense is that with the passing of time, these suggestions are being taken more and more seriously (both the German theologians, and the bishops conducting the visitation of the Irish church, have suggested that the abuse scandal must result in far-reaching reform of church culture and procedures).

We are already seeing a greater acceptance of the need for sexuality education for priests, with programmes being introduced in seminaries, and also for in-service training for existing priests. There is a long way still to go, but a start has been made.

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

 


Enhanced by Zemanta

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (3: Internal Contradictions in Church Teaching) -

After considering some of the transformations that have irrevocably changed the Catholic Church, I consider now some of the internal contradictions in Vatican doctrine on sexuality.

Catechism, and homosexuality

The Catechism instructs (correctly) that sexuality is an important element of our human make-up, and urges the full integration of our sexuality is essential for a well-rounded personality:

“Everyone, man and woman, should acknowledge and accept his sexual identity.” (2333)

and

“Sexuality, in which man’s belonging to the bodily and biological world is expressed, becomes personal and truly human when it is integrated into the relationship of one person to another” (2337)

- but only if our sexual orientation is strictly heterosexual. Elsewhere, it urges that homosexuals should be treated with compassion, respect and understanding – but understanding the other is only possible if it includes respectful listening. I know of no evidence that the institutional Church is making any effort at all at either listening to us and the lessons of our experience, or to understand by any other means.

Sensus Fidelium and Contraception

The idea of the “Sensus Fidelium” tells us that unless a teaching has been accepted by the church “as a whole”, it has no validity. The full doctrine is complex and subtle, and I fully accept that it is not a simple matter of counting heads by opinion poll. But however we assess, it, I cannot see any way at all of concluding that the teaching on contraception has been accepted by the church as a whole. I therefore ask, on what possible basis, can we accept it as fully valid teaching? Next, I have to ask, on what basis can we agree that the primary purpose of sex is procreation, so that every single genital act must be open to making babies? If we reject this idea, we then have to ask, on what reasonable basis can the rest of Vatican sexual doctrines be supported, as given?

Vatican documents pay lip service to the importance of taking due note of the findings of the natural and social sciences – but on sexuality, completely ignore these. We who are here know well that a homoerotic sexual orientation is entirely natural, a non-pathological condition we are born with (rather like being left-handed), so I will not expand on this here. Instead, I want to point to some findings from science on animal sexuality. It’s becoming better known these days that homosexuality occurs naturally in the animal kingdom, but the full extent of this, and other aspects of animal sexuality are not as well-known.

Science, and Natural Sexuality

Bruce Bagemihl has collected extensive evidence that same-sex activities have been observed and described in scientific papers for several hundred species of mammals and birds, and also for many other species of reptiles and insects. The chances are that same-sex activities have also been observed, but misinterpreted, or simply not reported, for many more species, and may occur without human observation, for many more. (Some writers believe that homoerotic interactions occur in most or even all mammal species). We do have detailed reports on these activities for almost all species of primates, and especially for those closest to us on the evolutionary scale. For some species, and for many individuals in others, same-sex coupling is actually more common than the between-sex variety.

Even for heterosexual animals, sexual actions are not solely geared to procreation. Scientific observations also describe mating outside the time of oestrus, or by anal intercourse, or intercourse without penetration, or without ejaculation; for some primates, juveniles begin sexual activity well before the onset of physical maturity and fertility (as much as two years before); masturbation is common, alone or with others (even without hands); oral sex has been observed in chimps, fruitbats and a few other species; some primates make their own sex toys, making dildos from pieces of liana vine, or masturbation aids from fruit; chimps, monkeys and penguins are known to engage in a form of prostitution, exchanging sexual services for material rewards.

There are even species which show trans behaviours, from cross-dressing to full gender transitioning, and which have more than a simple two distinct genders.

If we are to rely on the evidence of biological science to determine the “purpose” of sex, it becomes clear that procreation is just one of many such purposes. Others include social bonding and conflict resolution or avoidance, material gain – and simply physical pleasure.

As with the evidence from human sciences, and the responses of Catholics themselves, it is clear that the belief that only sex open to procreation is natural and acceptable, simply does not stand up to scrutiny.

Some Straws in the Wind

I think that over the past few years, there has been a decided shift in tone coming from the Vatican, and at least some senior bishops. In April last year, Cardinal Schonborn of Vienna remarked that it was time for the Church to end the obsession with homosexual genital acts, and to begin thinking instead about the quality of our relationships. (He also said that we should end the prohibition on remarriage after divorce, because it is ludicrous to stop some people from marrying when so many are not bothering to marry at all – an argument that could apply equally to gay marriage. These thoughts were interesting, but more important was the response. In over a year since then, not a single bishop has said anything to reject or repudiate them – and a fair number of others have made other statements indicating a shift to a more welcoming tone.

From my point of view, the most encouraging of these were several statements by Vincent Nichols of Westminster and Bernard Longley about the Soho Masses, quite bluntly telling our opponents to end their criticism. In Sydney, even Cardinal Pell has said much the same thing to the opponents of the Sydney equivalent, declaring that LGBT Catholics are “welcome” in the Catholic Church.

One of the minor news item that caught my attention recently were some words of Pope Benedict on Joan of Arc. In my work on the queer saints and martyrs in church history, she is one of those that most interests me, as a cross-dressing martyr. Unlike the early Christian martyrs, she was martyred not for the Church, but by the Church – and was later rehabilitated. Pope Benedict spoke about how she had been convicted for heresy by the theologians of the church, and quite pointedly observed that her later canonization showed that it was perfectly possible for theologians to turn out to be mistaken. Draw your own conclusions about current orthodoxy.

Very recently, the Vatican hosted an important conference on responses to HIV/AIDS, including the place of condoms in prevention strategies. What was notable here was that this conference was not simply limited to the same old Vatican experts speaking to each other without reference to the real world, but also included secular experts with very different perspectives. Another such conference on sexual abuse is planned for February 2011, and will also include secular experts, as well as the Vatican bureaucrats. It is becoming possible for me to imagine that some day, we could even see such a conference on sexual orientation, with gay and lesbian participants talking directly to those who have previously dictated Vatican thinking from their celibate or closeted ivory towers.

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

Come Out, Stand Proud (The Catechism Commands It!)

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Uncategorized. No Comments »

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (4: Where Are We Headed?)

Predicting the future is dangerous, and I have no desire to make wild guesses, so I will simply point out one observation on what we can consider to be fairly certain, and a few more on what will be highly probable.

Certain: Generational Change

The certainty is simple: By 2046, Benedict XVI will no longer be pope. Between now and then we will have at least one new pontiff (probably more), and with him a new set of bishops. We do not know who they are, but we do know that most of these will be men (and just conceivably, a few women) who are now in training, recently ordained, or not yet in seminary. Their training, and the world they have grown up in, is vastly different to that which applied to the priests in training around 1976 and earlier, which includes many of the current bishops.

This generation approximates to that of my daughter Robynn, who was born in 1976, the year that the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement was founded, and the starting year for the period of review covered by this series.  Apart from her very early years, Robynn grew up knowing that in effect, she had two fathers. Her verdict on the experience, which she has frequently shared in public, is “Gay parents? I recommend them”. She has told me that when she sees a child accompanied by two moms or two dads, her immediate reaction is “lucky child”. Her reasoning is that based on her observation of here peers at school, she believes that she received a sounder grounding in moral values from her fathers, than her classmates had from their more traditional parents. The point is, that in the same way that she grew up conscious of the moral standards of her friends’ parents, they too were conscious of ours. There are estimated at present to be two million American children now being raised by gay or lesbian parents. The numbers will have been lower thirty years ago, but they will still have been substantial. Today’s younger priests, like Robynn’s friends, also grew up knowing people in queer families. They too will have reached conclusions about those parents, and collectively will know that some were excellent, some were poor, and most were middling – just like everyone else.

(more…)

Sexual Nature: Picture Gallery

A standard argument for the Vatican doctrine that the sole purpose of sex is for procreation, is based on the assumption that all other forms and purposes of sex are not found in nature, and are therefore unnatural, and contrary to God’s purpose. There pictures clearly demonstrate the contrary.

Same-sex intercourse, sex in threesomes, masturbation, and oral sex all occur in nature, have been described in the scientific literature, and are illustrated here. Primates also use sex toys, making dildos from vine stems and masturbation aids from fruit (pictured here).

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

David Frum: “I was wrong about same-sex marriage”

One of the characteristics of the conservative arguments against same-sex marriage has been how little basis they have in any kind of evidence. In one court case after another, arguments based on protecting the family have been shown to have no foundation in factual evidence; arguments from scripture have been refuted by Biblical scholars; and arguments based on claims about “traditional” marriage are contradicted by the historical facts.

The supporters of marriage equality know this. One by one, some high profile opponents are coming to acknowledge that they were wrong. David Frum, for instance, declares that he was once a strong opponent of same-sex marriage, but now finds himself unperturbed by the success of New York’s bill to recognize gay marriage. The reason, he points out, is that the evidence since gay marriage evolved from talk to fact, has simply not supported the claims of the opponents.

 

(more…)

Stonewall, and the Progress to LGBT Inclusion in Church

Stonewall has been very much in the news these past few days: while the interminable delays over approval of New York’s bill to recognize same-sex marriage was frustrating and stressful, the eventual passage, late on Friday night, coincided with celebrations around New York City’s pride weekend. Inevitably, news coverage, in print and on screen, showed countless images of deliriously happy crowds in front of the modern facade of the Stonewall Inn.

I spent the weekend at the 35th anniversary conference of the UK Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement, where I introduced a Catholic perspective on the conference of  theme looking back, looking ahead, so the history of inclusion in Church has been very much on my mind. Later, I will post the full text that I prepared for the conference. Today, for the Stonewall anniversary, I want to share some thoughts on the progress to inclusion for the wider Church. (more…)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Switch to our mobile site