35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (4: Where Are We Headed?)

Predicting the future is dangerous, and I have no desire to make wild guesses, so I will simply point out one observation on what we can consider to be fairly certain, and a few more on what will be highly probable.

Certain: Generational Change

The certainty is simple: By 2046, Benedict XVI will no longer be pope. Between now and then we will have at least one new pontiff (probably more), and with him a new set of bishops. We do not know who they are, but we do know that most of these will be men (and just conceivably, a few women) who are now in training, recently ordained, or not yet in seminary. Their training, and the world they have grown up in, is vastly different to that which applied to the priests in training around 1976 and earlier, which includes many of the current bishops.

This generation approximates to that of my daughter Robynn, who was born in 1976, the year that the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement was founded, and the starting year for the period of review covered by this series. Apart from her very early years, Robynn grew up knowing that in effect, she had two fathers. Her verdict on the experience, which she has frequently shared in public, is “Gay parents? I recommend them”. She has told me that when she sees a child accompanied by two moms or two dads, her immediate reaction is “lucky child”. Her reasoning is that based on her observation of here peers at school, she believes that she received a sounder grounding in moral values from her fathers, than her classmates had from their more traditional parents. The point is, that in the same way that she grew up conscious of the moral standards of her friends’ parents, they too were conscious of ours. There are estimated at present to be two million American children now being raised by gay or lesbian parents. The numbers will have been lower thirty years ago, but they will still have been substantial. Today’s younger priests, like Robynn’s friends, also grew up knowing people in queer families. They too will have reached conclusions about those parents, and collectively will know that some were excellent, some were poor, and most were middling - just like everyone else.

Less certain, but highly probable, is a continuation of some important social and political trends. I expect to see many more countries making legal provisions for same-sex marriage and gay adoption. This will be driven by a continuing increase in public support, as conservative opponents recognise the abundant evidence that the warnings that marriage equality will lead to social collapse, have simply not been supported by the evidence. Liberals, and the majority of Catholics in the US and Europe, already support equal provision for all families: in the years ahead, there will be increasing support from social conservatives and the mainstream Protestant denominations. Even more members of our community will be living fully out of the closet, and that will include out in church. In the Protestant churches, almost all will come to accept openly gay and partnered clergy, just as they now accept women in ministry. By 2046, it is likely that some of these will have reached positions of leadership in at least some denominations or regions.

Moving from probability to speculation, I would expect that even in the Catholic Church, we will begin to see more of our gay priests beginning to creep part way out of their closets.

Will There be Change in the Catholic Church on Sexual Issues?

This is the wrong question. For the Church as a whole, change has already begun. What Catholics really do believe, as opposed to what we are told to believe, is that sexual expression is about far more than simply making babies, is natural and healthy, and is no more sinful with same-sex partners than with traditional opposite-sex spouses. Catholics also no longer believe that they must follow blindly every command from Rome. Catholic theologians across a wide front now recognise that there is an urgent need for change, in sexual doctrine, in the church culture of excessive clericalism, on Vatican restrictions of ordination to celibate males, and even to the Vatican attempts to impose creeping infallibility. It is probable that a substantial proportion of bishops and cardinals also know this. The challenge they face, is how to acknowledge it publicly. It is never easy to admit that one has been wrong for years - still less, when there has been a pretence of omniscience and infallibility.

It is not change in the Church that we are waiting for, but more specifically change in the church leadership. The Catholic Church has already started to move on – now we are waiting for the Vatican to catch up.

The parental imagery: “Holy Mother the Church”, and “The Holy Father”.

Personally, I am uncomfortable with the traditional Catholic imagery which presents the pope and the “church” resents us as saintly, wise parents, and the rest of us as docile, obedient children. However, there is another way of looking at this image of family relationships. In human families, children often grow into rebellious adolescents. Many of us have been through a period of rebellion against the Church (or are still rebelling). Later, this develops into adult relationships of equality and mutual respect. Later still, we as adults care (lovingly?) for our ageing and frail parents.

 

QUESTIONS:

How can we, as adult and responsible queer Catholics, encourage and extend the change now occurring?

How can we:

i) help those who have not yet done so to grow beyond child-like automatic obedience or adolescent rebellion?;

ii) help and care for in love, our ageing parent, the Church?

 

*******

35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

 

Related articles

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

6 comments for “35 Years as LGBT Catholics: Looking Back, Looking Ahead (4: Where Are We Headed?)

  1. Martinjp
    June 28, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    Well done, Terry - a tour de force!

    • June 28, 2011 at 2:58 pm

      Thanks Martin. It’s been a major investment in time getting it down, so I’m
      pleased it’s appreciated.

  2. Kevin
    June 28, 2011 at 6:35 pm

    Terry, I applaud this work. You were able to see positive “forces,” if not concrete decisions within the Church that point to a more hopeful future. I need to read this. At times over the past handful of years I have been sorely tempted to throw in the towel on the institutional Church. B 16, in particular, strikes me as utterly opposed to even listening to gay Catholics. I can’t say that your words have altered my opinion of His Holiness, but they at least give me a fuller picture. Oh, you didn’t mention the work of your own (Fr.) James Alison who portrays B16 as a sort of Pius XII when it comes to these issues. Like Pius, Benedict won’t/can’t make the changes necessary, but he’s opening the door so the next pontiff can. I don’t see it, but I hold Alison in such great esteem that I cannot discount his words.

    • June 28, 2011 at 10:15 pm

      Thanks for your kind words, Kevin. One of the personal highlights of the conference for me came after hours, when I twice had the privilege of having dinner with James, and some fascinating conversation that went with it. Some of the information he shared, from his wide network of contacts, suggest that there could be some material signs of progress coming up in the not too distant future.

      I have also been intrigued, in the copious commentary over NY gay marriage, by suggestions that Archbishop Dolan was late getting into the battle against, and effectively left the ring before the final vote. Add in his very muted response after the fact, and I have a suspicion that he and some other bishops, just like Focus on the Family, have privately admitted defeat.

      I hope to address the NY marriage win, and the notable Catholic contribution to the victory, tomorrow.

      • Kevin
        June 29, 2011 at 3:42 pm

        His Excellency’s soft-pedaling of the gay marriage push is much disputed, on both sides. William Lindsay at bilgrimage.blogspot.com believes Dolan et al. were very actively pushing the marriage inequality agenda.

        There’s another potential bright side on this side of the pond. The GOP (Republicans) don’t seem to know how to handle this issue. The rallying cry that got Bush II re-elected (Stop gay marriage!) is not being re-echoed this time around. (Caution: it’s early and there are some among the, what, 18 candidates who are still rabidly anti-gay.

        To be crass, what I think is more significant for gay equality here is…money! The NY Times noted how BIG financiers on Wall St. pledged millions of campaign dollars to Catholic GOP representatives to shield them from the inevitable and ferocious attacks from NOM that are already underway. What has steered much of our Bishops’ conference is money from super-wealthy Catholics. I suspect that when progressive wealthy Catholics start using their money to leverage the hierarchy, there will be change.

        • June 29, 2011 at 3:57 pm

          I’m not sure I agree with Bill on how actively the NY bishops were pushing against equality - see my post today, specifically on the NY win.

          I do agree that there is huge upside in the turnaround within the GOP, which is also being seen with some evangelical church people. There are many battles still to be fought and possibly lost, but I am convinced that overall, the war is being won - and the conservatives on all sides, including Catholics, are coming to recognise this.

Leave a Reply