Benedict’s Latest Attack on Gay Marriage

Previous reports of Benedict’s “attacks” on gay marriage may conceivably have been exaggerated, misrepresentation, or misinterpretation of his dense theological language. There can be no mistaking this one. My response is based on a verbatim English translation by the Catholic news agency Zenit of the transcript carried on the Vatican website, of remarks made to the new German envoy (not to fellow theologians).

Pope Benedict XVI celebrates the Eucharist, a ...

Image via Wikipedia

The point of departure was a reflection on the Nazi Holocaust. The English speaking Catholic world right now is focused on the imminent beatification of Cardinal Newman, but the Germans are more interested in their own:

Many Christians in Germany are looking forward with great attention to the imminent celebrations of the beatifications of several martyr priests of the time of the Nazi regime. This Sunday, Sept. 19, Gerhard Hirschfelder will be beatified in Munster. During the coming year ceremonies will follow for Georg Hafner in Wurzburg, in addition to those for Johannes Prassek, Hermann Lange and Eduard Muller in Lubeck. Commemorated also with the chaplains of Lubeck will be Evangelical pastor Karl Friedrich Stellbrink. The attested friendship of the four ecclesiastics is an impressive testimony of the ecumenism of prayer and suffering, flowering in several places during the dark period of the Nazi terror. We can see these testimonies as luminous indications for a common ecumenical path.

Contemplating the figures of these martyrs, it seems ever clearer and exemplary how certain men are willing, given their Christian conviction, to give their own life for the faith, for the right to exercise freely their own creed and liberty of speech, for peace and human dignity. Today, fortunately, we live in a free and democratic society.

-Zenit

Democratic, that is, except inside the Church itself. It is ironic that he should gives thanks for democracy in the modern world, while absolutely excluding all semblance of it inside his own realm – in spite of his youthful ideals to the contrary. That, however, is not my main theme for this post, and I let it pass, for now. (more…)

Pope Benedict’s Boyfriend.

For years there has been some sotte voce speculation about the relationship between Pope Benedict and his secretary, Georg Gänswein – speculation which has ratchetted up several notches since the publication of the book, “The Pope Is Not Gay!“. (For a stunning reflection on this, see the essay by Colm Toibin at the London Review of Books)

(more…)

Un-Catholic at Pride: Protest the Pope, or Ignore Him?

While walking down Oxford Street with other gay/lesbian Catholics, I suddenly found myself faced with a BBC television camera and reporter. “What,” she asked, “do you think of the pope’s UK visit?”

This has become highly topical, and highly emotional here. Even today, there are some permanent tensions which have their background in the historical development of the Anglican church, and the subsequent suppression of the Catholic faith, when Catholicism was seen as a form of treason (and incidentally, lumped  together with heresy and sodomy as the greatest of sins against religion. Today, traces of the legal restrictions remain in the unequal status of the “established” Anglican church and the others, while deep suspicion lingers in some quarters about the Catholic (and other) faith schools, about the regular interventions by Catholic bishops in political debates on abortion legislation,  civil partnerships / gay marriage, gay adoption rights, and most recently about the successful attempts to thwart parts of recent equality legislation intended to prevent discrimination by church employers. The stories of clerical abuse and inadequate church response over the past year have simply added to the hostility of a small anti-Catholic minority, and a wider anti-papal/ anti-Vatican feeling of some others (including many progressive Catholics). What has really added fuel to the fire, is that this is to be treated as a state visit, with substantial cost to the British taxpayer, at a time when the new government is announcing plans to slash expenditure across a wide front. No wonder some people are angry.

This particularly includes the LGBT community, and so there was a strong anti-papal presence at the London Pride parade, with a banner, and leaflet distributors. The reporter in front of me was clearly preparing a program not on Gay Pride specifically, but a broader current affairs program on the papal visit, with gay and gay Catholic reactions just one element. (more…)

A “Secularized” West – Or a Secularized Church?

Pope Benedict has created a new Vatican office to “re-evangelize” the West, aiming to combat it’s “secularization”. My immediate reaction on reading this was to wonder if by “secularization”, he is truly concerned about a loss of faith, or the precipitous decline of the Catholic Church in Europe? At USA Today, Cathy Lynn Grossman asks the same question: “Is it God or the Catholic Church facing ‘eclipse’ in the West?“.

There is no doubt at all that in Europe at least, loyal adherence to the teaching of Catholic Church is in free fall. Belgium is one dramatic example: once universally Catholic, it is now one of the most secularized countries in Europe. Only 7% attend weekly Mass, half of babies are not baptized, and three quarters of couples do not marry in church). In Austria, the number of people formally leaving the church annually, now at over 80 000, has doubled over the past two years – and this is a measure of formal resignation, not just of a gradual drift. A similar process of a steadily increasing rate of formal resignations, is similarly under way in Germany. In Ireland, which was once widely described as “priest-ridden”, many Catholics hold the institutional Church in open contempt. (more…)

Episcopal Accountability: To The Monastery, Or To The Stake?

When I started writing about it, I called it bishops “breaking ranks”. Jason Berry, writing at NCR, calls it “Cracks in the Curia”, but we mean the same thing: the erosion of that uniform solidarity that has traditionally protected bishops from mutual attack, and from fear of meaningful punishment for serious offence. Whatever term we use, it is important for the evidence now coming out that several people knew that some powerful figures in the Church (notably Cardinal Sodano) were bending over backwards to protect people accused of sexual abuse, against children and against adults.

The Roman Curia is the Vatican bureaucracy. Most people know little about the men who run the curia. But press coverage of the clergy abuse crisis is closing in on cardinals whose blunders in the clergy abuse crisis have begun to draw criticism from other Princes of the Church.
As words fire back and forth in the press, the wall of secrecy that traditionally surrounds the curia is showing cracks.

Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Embraced by Benedict XVI at Easter Mass

As Berry points out, in the most serious cases, a handful of bishops have been removed from their posts, but none have been removed from office or deprived of income and support.  He also speaks of the archaic and flawed “justice” system in  Vatican procedures as a holdover from the days of the Inquisition.

The central issue of this long aching crisis is the Vatican’s flawed justice system, rooted in archaic tribunals that use secret proceedings, a holdover from the Inquisition. (more…)

Benedict, Gay Marriage, and the real “Insidious Threat”.

I suppose I should be angry at Benedict’s remarks yesterday on gay marriage, but in fact I find I can’t be bothered. Instead, what strikes me is how clearly these remarks exemplify Mark Jordan’s demonstration of the weakness of the Vatican’s rhetoric against homoerotic relationships, because that is all it is – rhetoric. There is no rational argument, there is no evidence, no recognition of the Church’s own deeply homoerotic culture – and there is no history. This apparently implacable opposition is of recent origin, and can in principle vanish as quickly as it came.

Too many contemporary discussions of Catholic homosexuality circle endlessly within the words of a few recent documents, the oldest of which dates no further back than 1971. Historical foreshortening is typical of official moral theology, which wants to squeeze its readers into the prevailing regulations.What matters is the current ruling.

-Mark Jordan,The Silence of Sodom

The first thing that struck me about his remarks when I read them last night was how completely devoid they were of any substantiation, any clarification of his reasoning, or any description of just how gay (civil) marriage constitutes a threat to traditional marriage. In this, he resembles the familiar bluster of US opponents of marriage, who rant similarly about the “threats” – but cannot explain how marriage is threatened by its expansion.

In the absence of any reasoning, therefore, let us look instead at the context. A reader asked, in response to my initial post last night, why the pope had coupled the issues of gay marriage and divorce. I guessed at an answer which I now think was only half- right: Portuguese politics. As Fr Geoff Farrow clearly explains, it is indeed politics – but not simply the Portuguese variety. In fact, yesterday’s remarks joined not only gay marriage and abortion, but also divorce. All three of these are currently hot-button issues in Portuguese politics. As Fr Farrow reminds us, it was only in 1971 that Pope John XXIII set aside the triple crowned tiara, of which one represented temporal power.

John XXIII - the last to wear the triple tiara.

We easily forget that until the early nineteenth century, the papacy occupied extensive spatial territory, and was a real temporal power, with substantial sway in international and domestic politics across Europe. (more…)

Benedict’s “Insidious Threat” of Gay Marriage (Updated)

In breaking news, reports from Fatima are that after concluding Mass today, Pope Benedict XVI made remarks which described gay marriage, and abortion, as “insidious threats”. I have not yet seen any indication of the reasoning behind these conclusions, nor even if any were offered.

While we wait for more complete reporting, I would just say that the world, and the church, are surely facing far more serious threats than pairs of men, or women, who love each other wanting to express that in public, permanent commitment – and possibly raise children together in a sound, healthy family atmosphere.

Remember that the very Catholic Portuguese president is sitting on legislation, already approved by the parliament and the Constitutional Court, to approve gay marriage. (more…)

A Reader Responds: Marie on Ratzinger and Kiestle

In a lengthy response to my earlier post “The Buck Stops …..Way Over There”, a reader (“Marie”) has posted a comment taken from a Reuters report which provides an account of the Vatican explanation. As I do not believe that a comments thread is the right place for lengthy pieces, I have instead copied it here.

The thrust of the defence appears to be that it is wrong to treat this as protecting a child molester, as the case concerned a simple request to leave the priesthood. The Vatican claims that it is this that was “scandalous”, and was resisted. I don’t think the facts are in dispute how – just the interpretation. I fail to see why a request from a convicted child molester to leave the priesthood is somehow more “scandalous” to the reputation on the church than a decision to leave him in he priesthood, where he cold conceivably do more harm, against his wishes and the judgement of his local bishop. The Vatican has once again missed the point entirely: the issue here is not about disciplining a priest, nor is it about the supposed scandal of a man wishing to leave the priesthood. The fundamental point, which is entirely missing in both Ratzinger’s letter of 1985 and the current “defence”, should have been that of the safety of the children.  It  now becomes clearer than ever that this safety has never been the first concern of the Vatican as in institution, nor of Joseph Ratzinger the man.

This is Marie’s contribution:

A new report by Reuters says that this Ratzinger letter was in response to a simple request by Keisle to leave the priesthood.

A request to leave the priesthood is a scandal, yes, especially coming from a 38-year-old priest, and therefore the recommendation that the priest be given “paternal care” while the case is pending. (more…)

Hierarchy Complicitus

Watch this video, which presents in cartoon form all the responses and so-called defences emanating from the Vatican to charges that Benedict XVI (would you believe), in his time as Archbishop of Munich, may have had some part in the return to ministry of a convicted child molester in his diocese .  (Bear in mind, that this was prepared before the news broke yesterday of the bigger story of his role in resisting the removal from ministry of a convicted child molester in California.) As you watch, listen carefully to the words, both those from the coterie of cardinals, and from the wonderful choir in the background.

Among the treasures:

Cardinal: The buck stops — way over there.


Cardinal: This is all because of pop culture and Vatican II

Choir: No, because of you.
Hierarchy complicitus

Cardinal Ratzinger’s Smoking Gun.

This letter, signed by Joseph Ratzinger, clearly shows how his concern as head of the CDF was to protect the “good name” of the church before any consideration of protecting the people from convicted paedophiles. (For a translation, see below)

In 1981, the same year Ratzinger was appointed to head the CDF, Bishop John Cummins of Oakland, California, wrote to the Vatican requesting permission to defrock a priest with a criminal record of sexually molesting boys.  The priest in question had himself asked to leave the priesthood, so the case  should surely have been clear cut: protect the boys of the diocese, and accede to the wishes of the priest and the local bishop in removing him from ministry.  Yet it took Ratzinger four years, after repeated further letters from the diocese to check on the progress of the case, even to reply. The answer?  The request was denied (more…)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Switch to our mobile site