When modern writers suggest that the traditionally hostile interpretations of the Bible and homosexuality may be a misinterpretation or distortion of the real biblical message, defenders of the traditional view regularly allege that we are attempting to twist the supposedly clear of scripture to fit in with modern secular mores. The truth of course, is that it’s the other way around: the hostile interpretation is not inherent in the text itself, and was not a feature of the earliest Christian commentaries. Instead, the hostile interpretations were gradually imported from a range of non-Christian sources, to fit in with the increasingly hostile secular views of the late Hellenistic and later periods.
A fascinating account of reputable scholar making much the same points as modern gay - friendly interpretations over two hundred years ago, “Homosexuality of Jesus explored by 18th century philosopher Jeremy Bentham” has just been posted by Kittredge Cherry at Jesus in Love blog.
I will not comment on this myself without first reading carefully her material and sources - so here’s the opening of her post. Read it in full at Jesus in Love - and as a bonus, she has links to Bentham’s original text, which is freely available on-line.







