In Celebration of Pride Celebrations

[In his introductory post last week, "A Dissenting Queer View: Cardinal George, Gay Pride ",  Advocatus Diaboli expressed essentially two distinct concerns. One was about the overreaction by some gay activists/ gay Catholics to the Cardinal's words, and one was about the nature of gay pride itself.  The piece he wrote was not originally intended for publication, but was for my personal consideration. As it was at my request that he posted it for public scrutiny, I promised to provide a full response, here. It was my intention to do this in two posts, for the two different concerns, but Cardinal George's apology last week has largely removed the point of that one. Here is my response to AD, on the issue of gay pride specifically].

AD’s concern over Pride Parade appears to spring from the feelings of self-disgust that he experienced on seeing the displays of scantily – clad men, and his fear that he might be secretly “one of them”. Oddly enough, this is precisely the reason why Pride is important. Let’s take a closer look at his words:

……every time I saw depictions of scantily clad men parading down the street in some obnoxious display I was filled with self-disgust that I was secretly ‘one of them’. I thought that if I accepted who I was that I would immediately become a sex obsessed ‘queen’ who dressed like a prostitute-fairy. I was not able to accept myself as gay until after I found out that there were ‘normal’ gay people.

“Every time I saw “depictions” of…. I wonder: is this a response to real gay pride parades, or to the presentation of them in the media?

Yes, of course there are some unusual sights to be seen, expanses of naked or near – naked man-flesh, flamboyant drag queens, and perhaps leather men and their slaves/ boys – but these get into the papers precisely because they are exceptional. In my experience of London Pride, the “freaks” (as some may think of them), are vastly outnumbered by the others: those who are what AD describes as “normal gay people”.

When I think of the mental images that I take away from the London Pride parades I have participated in, I see a few of the extremes that upset AD and others, but I also see far, far more.

I see squads of military men and women, from the army, air force and navy, marching in uniform. I see groups from the police, fire brigades, and ambulance services.

I see charities and public service groups: Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, Age Concern, the National Health Service, and Terence Higgins Trust. There are groups from all three major political parties, as well as some smaller ones and lobbying groups. I see community, social and recreational groups, sports clubs and the like. Above all, (and this is why I participate mmyself) I also see hundreds of people from religious groups: Catholics, other Christians, Jews, Muslims and more.

And I see the commercially sponsored floats, promoting dance clubs and the like, or gym chains. And – note carefully – many of the hunky men in skimpy speedos are there as walking ads, promoting those gyms and clubs.

Why don’t straight people have pride parades, or African-Americans, or Jewish people? Because they don’t need to. Straight people don’t need to, because they are everywhere, and everyone you meet is automatically assumed to be straight. So, the whole of society is structured towards the needs and interests of the straights. Young people grow up learning how to be straight – and when they begin to realise that they are somehow different, they think there is something wrong with them. At best, they simply have a problem learning to fit in, in a society that is not designed for them. At worst, they end up suicidal. We need pride parades, not only to show that there are gay people who are “normal”, that is just like everybody else, but also to show that straight is not “normal” (it’s just common). Jews, African-Americans and the like don’t need parades, because they don’t need to make a point to be visible. They are that anyway, but still have some parades. AD says that at theirs, the main theme is not sex and glitter – but that is also not the case at gay pride. That’s just one part of it, just as it is at London’s Notting Hill Carnival, or Rio de Janeiro’s Mardi Gras.

I’m not going to labour this point any further, but I really do think that before rejecting Pride because it is all about sex and glitter, people should ignore the press coverage, attend a real-world parade, and look closely at the full diversity that is there. They may even find that there are very many people there that they can identify with, the kind of people that AD says led him to a measure of self-acceptance in the first place.

AD asks, how can Pride help us to gain acceptance from La Salette and the like? The short answer, is that it won’t. Nothing will, and there’s no point in fretting about it. Let them deal with the problem of their bigotry and hatred, themselves. I am far more concerned with encouraging and assisting self-acceptance by gay and lesbian people themselves. To see that this happens, try joining a parade some time. To walk down the street, and to see the responses of the people in the crowd, gives me a huge emotional lift every time. I guarantee that it’s worth the fatigue, sore feet and possible sunburn.

AD asks, “How much money is spend on the organization of such a parade?” The answer, quite clearly, is “A lot”. What is the point of the question? One could equally ask, how much money is spent on Christmas? Or on the Rio Mardi Gras? Or on making a movie? People spend money on it because they want to, because for some of them it will make money in return – and because some of the proceeds go to charity.

AD  states that

“Not a single solitary person alive today in the United States knows one iota of true discrimination, having their rights as a human-being violated, or anything approaching real suffering”.

This is simply not true. Discrimination is real, in the US, in the UK, in South Africa and elsewhere. Every year, gay men, lesbians and (especially) transmen and women are murdered, tortured or beaten in all these countries. In the UK and South Africa, gay bars have been bombed, and in the US, customers of the Upstairs Lounge Bar died in an arson attack. In South Africa, many black lesbians are subjected to “corrective rape”, in attempts by some homophobic men to “cure” them of their orientation. Discrimination in employment, housing and public services is real in many countries – and should not be dismissed simply because it is not direct physical harm. I also find it odd that in his comparison of  what he sees as the privileged lives of the  LGBT community and “real suffering”, AD appears to be assuming that pride is unique to the rich Western countries, and suffering to the impoverished third world. However, Pride parades and smaller scale pride events are now a world -wide phenomenon, and take place on all continents. (The biggest Pride Parade in the world takes place in Sao Paulo, which regularly has over 3 million participants)

AD, I now address myself directly to you. It was at my request that you places this publicly, knowing full well that you could be facing some risk of personal attack for your views. I made the request because  although I disagree with you, I also know that you are not by any means alone in thinking this way. I wanted to bring this into the open, so that I could respond openly. I hope you will feel that I have done so constructively, and thank you for your co-operation and courage.  I close with some parting advice, for yourself, and other gay man or lesbian who is equally disturbed by the unsavoury “depictions” of gay pride.

I began this post by referring to your own account of your self-loathing, which you began to set aside when you were able to see that there existed “normal” gay people. I would like to suggest two ideas for you to reflect on, and do so deeply.

First, consider the key point I have tried to hammer above: that there is far more celebration of the “normal” in Pride parades than you appear to be aware of. The sex and the glitter are peripheral, not normal.

Second, please consider that what you see as “normal” is not necessarily better. “Normal” means only what is common. Just as there is diversity of orientation in the wider population, and diversity needs to be accepted and celebrated, inside the GLBT community, there is a range of ways in which we experience and express our sexuality and gender identity. You have made progress along your journey to self-acceptance, but that journey is never done. Coming out is a never-ending process. I would like to suggest, respectfully, that you could make more progress on that journey by opening your mind to the value of pride,  by attending a pride parade – or even by participating.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
  • http://profiles.google.com/felidista Jennifer Hynes

    Heterosexuality isn’t normal, it’s just common. Where have I heard that before… Excellent riposte article Terry, but I feel I must side with AD on the applicability of pride parades. Certainly here in the UK at any rate. They have lost their political mojo, there reason for existing in the first place and the crass commercialisation of them has led many LGBT people to boycott them. There was a major uproar when Brighton Pride announced they wanted to charge for entry to events, and do beleive that if they are to exist at all, it should be as a gift from those who have the resources, groups or individuals, NOT as a profit making enterprise.

    It is difficult though, to try and remove sex from pride. After all, it is all about sexual identity. But what I think AD was trying ot get across was his distaste for the image that many straight people get from pride as served up to them by the media, there doesn’t seem to be any attempt by organisers and participants to alter this. I have always thought the gyrating scantily-clad men were obnoxious, no matter that they are suppsoed to be advertising gyms or whatever. Perhaps the major problem is that the focus of much of the more distasteful images is sex itself and not sexuality.

    For myself I’ve never been on a pride parade or LGBT march of any kind. I saw one once, briefly, but I am hopeful of going on the dyke march in London in March. This will be my first queer action ever! If I make it… Good post and challenging to.

  • Advocatus Diaboli

    Interesting. Thank you for your response. There are a few points I would rebuttal (such as the assumption that I am ok with the amount of money that is spent on the commercialization of Christmas and the Rio Carinval, particularly when that country has so many living in destitution), but there really would not be much of a point; on the other points, it was a bit of a learning experience. I would have preferred that I did not have to learn those things in front of everyone else, which is why I expressed apprehension about making our conversation into posts, and why I originally wanted to hear your response before allowing my comment to be posted; but I see what you were doing. My irrational ‘ego’ is a little upset I think for looking like an a******e, but my rational ‘mind’ feels that you are probably right about the constructive nature of what you chose to do.

    I love the Grinch movie by Jim Carrey. It perfectly captures how christmas is corrupted by commercialization and money. You should watch it if you have not seen it in a few years. I think that someone needs to make a similar movie about how gay pride has been similarly corrupted, “How the Grinch Stole Gay Pride” or something.

    • http://queeringthechurch.com/ Terence Weldon

      Relax, please. You were NOT made to look like anything. There was a lot of good stuff in your post, and some of the readers here agreed with it. You had a point of view, which is reasonable and not uncommon, and I had another.

      The problem with asking me for a strictly personal response, is that it takes time to prepare, to do it any justice. If I am to put that kind of time in, I want to be able to share it more widely.

      I think the site has benefited from your contribution. I thank you for it (again), and look forward to placing the next one.

      • Advocatusdiaboli88

        aww, thanks :-) . I’m glad I could contribute – as I;ve stated before, your work means a lot to me.

  • Mario

    Hey, what happened to acceptance and welcoming of diversity?  How about the beauty and gift of it?  Or, is is that diversity is only welcome, accepted and valued when it is on our terms?

    I love going some place, any place and being SHOCKED.  It is absolutely wondrous to be challenged especially by my own community.  When was the last time you were challenged at Mass?  Maybe we should be!!!  Do gay priests say mass in pumps?  Maybe they should!

    When I was at San Francisco Pride last year, the first thing we saw in the parade was the leather community entry which consisted of a man in a leather horse gear and an anal tale and his master with a whip and … the rest of the “court”.  I have seen this before, but nonetheless, I was shocked at the bold presentation, especially at the beginning of the parade.  And isn’t that what is was all about, shock? Shock is a good thing… it takes me out of my comfort place and forces me to confront (dance?) with the issue.  It makes me really think about what I am seeing… truly, I am no longer just a blob of a spectator.  And truly, in the end, the issue was never them… the issue was me!

    I believe the queer community is presenting an opportunity that is greater than the perceived and advertised notion of equal rights.  It goes beyond that into challenging everyone in and out of the community to find value in the unique expression of individuals that extends even to those who we find repulsive. In promoting equal rights for queers in marriage, employment and elsewhere, we are in fact, protecting everyone’s individual right to those things no matter the expression of their identity and fostering a environment of inclusiveness that says: though I may not agree with you, you are included and valued and may live on your terms.

    I have shared more about my response to Pride in AD’s post, so I won’t repeat it here!

    Thanks for allowing me to share.

    +Mario

    • Advocatus Diaboli

          It is not diversity so much that I think we are discussing here, but rather trying to control the ‘public image’ of the LGBT community during this trying struggle for equality.  Your comment on my article (which I want to thank you for your input by the way) asked “so what if I do not like drag queens and nearly naked guys?”. Well, what I was trying to get at was not so much my personal opinion of those people and wether they should or should not be doing those things, it is about what that message sends to non-members of the LGBT community (AKA straight people who can vote). People always take the most extraordinary difference between two groups of people and make that they stereotype of the particular group. For example, when you say “England” in the US, most American’s immediately think: Tea and crumpets, double-decker busses, the Queen, fancy accents, and jaguars and land rovers. But the truth is, that is not all that england is. Not everyone there likes tea and crumpets (as my friend’s mother, from England herself, can testify), not everyone rides double-decker busses, not everyone likes the Royal Family, not everyone has the same accent, and everyone defiantly does not own a jaguar or land rover. I experienced the same thing when I visited New York, from my home region of the South Central US. Almost every New Englander that I met asked me why I wasn’t wearing my cowboy boots, and if I ride my horse to school. I basically had to go through a small speech every time I met someone new, “No, I do not have a cowboy hat, I do not have nor have never owned cowboy boots, I do not own horses, I do not live on a ranch, I do not wear wrangler jeans, I drive a car to school and no it is not huge ford truck, I do not like iced-tea and coleslaw, I am not Southern Baptist, and I am not a registered Republican.”
          This is called stereotyping, and while it is not a good thing, it is something that humans do entirely by their nature; the less interaction that someone has with a group of people, the less they are familiar with them and aware of the diversity within that group. The only time that a large portion of the American population sees the LGBT community, is when the media presents pictures of extreme members of the LGBT community, and when there is some scandal involving them. Nothing else is reported, because everything else is just ‘normal’ and so ‘not worthy of note’. Therefore, despite the fact that ‘normal’ gay people are the ‘majority’, they remain invisible because they are not visually (or aurally) distinguishable from ‘normal’ straight people. That means that they only time most of the country is aware that someone is LGBT, it is because they are at the visually, aurally, or behaviorally  extreme end. People then, by nature of the human mind, associate those things with those groups. 
          Therefore, in the US at least, there is a distinct LACK of ‘normalcy’ in LGBT community (in the majority of Americans’ minds). Shock has good effects, because it can cause people to think outside the box and is challengeing. However, it also has bad effects, particularly when the majority of people (at least Americans) react to shock and the unexpected with a lot of negativity.  Most people who are against LGBT’s are against them specifically because they think the extreme end of the LGBT community is the WHOLE LGBT community. I know for the following reasons: 
      (1) my life is surrounded by mostly good people, but who are against LGBTs because they think that they are all promiscuous drug-addicts who proposition you for sex in public bathrooms and aggressively shove their sexuality in your face (because that is all they have been shown about LGBTs). I have been able to crack this image in the minds of several of these people (and show them that most LGBT people are actually more like they are then they are different) showed an instant and marked change in their stance on LGBT political goals (such as marriage and adoption rights); it changed from viewing the LGBT rights as a ‘threat’ to society to a more ‘well, I dont see why they cant have those rights’ type of attitude and sometimes to even full support for LGBT causes.
      (2) I saw this transition in myself, even as a homosexual. Where I grew up there was NO gay community. I grew up in an upper-class town of 100,000 people, which was a suburb of one of the largest cities in America, I went to a very large and very renowned school system, and my parents traveled all over the world on vacation every year. Despite this ‘worldly’ background, I did not even hear of another person (besides myself) being sexually attracted to people of the same-sex until I was about 17 years old. Even then, it was ONLY in negative commentary. The only time I EVER heard even the words ‘gay’ ‘homosexual’ or ‘LGBT’, it was attached to images of public fornication at the yearly Folsom Street Fair, the extreme people at Gay Pride events, and cases where an LGBT person was arrested on charges of violence or sexual-misconduct in public or with a minor. That was literally all I ever heard of or saw in relation to ‘homosexuals’. Needless to say, the public image of LGBT’s made me fear that if I accepted my sexuality that I would be destined to become just like that. When I was 20, I saw the first openly gay person I had ever seen in my life: he was in the ‘gay-ghetto’ in the big city about 45m from my town. He was a prostitute, dressed insanely, flashing his genitals to cars that drove by, and screaming that he was HIV-positive so anyone who already had HIV wouldn’t have to use a condom. The other people in the car commented that he was just one more example of the degeneracy and immorality of homosexuals. I was so horrified that I almost started crying on the spot out of fear and self-disgust that that prostitute was lurking inside me just waiting to ‘come out of the closet’. Every time I heard about a priest molesting a male child, I felt personal guilt; When I was about 22, news broke of a large gay sex scandal that tarnished something that I believed to be a beacon of light and good in the world; I was so disgusted with homosexuals and the personal shame I felt for being a member of a group that would non-chalantly defile something that was so important to many people pushed me over the edge and I decided to kill myself. Luckily, a kind priest intervened as I was crying in a pew before I followed through.  It was not until after I turned 23 years old that I was made aware of ‘normal’ LGBT people. As of today, Jan. 10, 2012, I am still 23 years old. One of the points of my article is that the actions of individual LGBT’s affects the community’s public image, and the community’s image is what largely defines non-LGBTs’ views of the community; and within that non-LGBT group, is a lot of LGBT’s who’s coming out process is complicated by the public image of the LGBT community, which is defined by the most visually and vocally extreme of its individuals, because they are all that is ‘worth reporting’ to the media. There were many factors involved, but the public image of the LGBT community was the single largest factor in my self-hate and in driving me to suicide. I would not be here to comment on this blog if that priest had not convinced me that God did not hate me, and the reason he was able to convince me of that is because he was able to discredit the public image that is projected by the LGBT community as unrepresentative of the majority.

      • Advocatusdiaboli88

         I do not live in an area that has an LGBT community or really any visible LGBT population at all. Therefore, despite being gay myself, I see the community as outsider’s see it, rather than what it looks like from inside the community. That is why I chose the name Devil’s Advocate, because being gay allows me to see things from the LGBT perspective, but by not having real access to the LGBT community, I see things from the non-lgbt perspective as well.

      • Advocatus Diaboli

        I forgot to say that the acts of individuals and public image of the LGBT community does not just complicate the issue for the closeted lgbt on their side, but also on their family’s side. When a friend of mine came out of the closet, he was expecting no real problem because his parents were Agnostics; however, they reacted largely negatively saying things like “we love you regardless, but it would be better if you could just ignore it and lead a healthy and happy life like we do”. After an argument, and a week of not speaking to each other, my friend realized that his parent’s objections to his embracing his homosexuality was because of their IMAGE of how homosexuals act and behave. Once he was able to convince his parents that he did not have to live a life of self-harm, substance abuse, public indecency, and depression then they were totally accepting of him living an openly gay lifestyle. Their objection was not to his homosexuality on moral grounds, it was over concern for his wellbeing, because the public image of LGBT’s in the US (though it has been rapidly changing in the past year and a half) is of unhealthy behaviors. I think that it would benefit, both politically and personally, the LGBT community it it self-restrained some of its ‘extreme individualism’ until we have a better public image in place that more accurately represents the majority of the community.

  • Colkoch

    This is great Terrence.  I am neatly torn by both points of view.  I used to argue all the time with a gay friend who tried to get me to understand the importance of the sexual aspects of Pride Parades.  He didn’t appreciate the fact I saw some of these guys as nothing more than exhibitionists who detracted from the real message of the parade. In the end we both agreed that men and women tend to view and experience sexuality quite differently and that was independent of orientation.  Men were a whole lot more visual than women.

    I got the last laugh though.  One night we were on a business trip in another American city and decided to have a late nightcap.  The only downtown bar open was a male leather bar.  For all his bluster and justification, he was utterly mortified and I was utterly obnoxious about his mortification.  Needless to say the drinks were taken in go cups.

  • Mario

    Say, here is a jolly piece on extremists by John Cleese, just to throw a little humor in the game. http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=HLNhPMQnWu4

Switch to our mobile site